Publication Process

The International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) Editor in Chief initially reads each submitted manuscript for desk review. Manuscripts that are not appropriate in terms of emphasis and scope will be rejected without delay and without undergoing an external review. Submissions deemed suitable for our audience's perusal would be routed to the reviewers. Afterwards, the editors decide which of the following options to pursue based on the reviewer's recommendation: rejection, major revision, minor revision, or acceptance. Two primary factors are taken into consideration throughout the double-blind peer review process to determine which article will be published in the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS): the paper's relevance and contribution to accounting theory and practical advancement. The author receives helpful criticism on the evaluation findings from editors and reviewers. The International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) Editor in Chief is entitled to select which of the submissions to the journal should be published.

Editors and reviewers provide insightful feedback to the author regarding the evaluation results. The Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing International (IJMaKS). The right to choose which of the journal submissions will be published belongs to the Editor in Chief. The following are the phases of the review process used by the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS):

  1. Manuscript submission. Only online processing, specifically through the OJS of the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) at https://feb-unri.com/index.php/ijmaks/index
  2. Manuscripts will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the author rules and submission template of the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) as well as that they are appropriate for the journal's emphasis and scope. The following step will be taken if necessary; if not, we suggest submitting the work to a different journal. The International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) editor will send out an email notification right away.
  3. Turnitin would be used to check the texts for similarities. In the desk evaluation process, the manuscripts would be discarded if the degree of manuscript similarity exceeded 30%. The editor in chief has the only authority to make this choice, which cannot be challenged.
  4. An allocated editor will assess the submissions to determine whether they sufficiently advance the field of accounting and investment science and practice. An editor and a peer reviewer will assess the manuscripts that pass this stage and move on to the next round of review.
  5. The accepted paper would be sent back to the author for revision after receiving feedback from peer reviewers and undergoing minor or substantial revisions. Reviewers provide recommendations solely, with reference to the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) policy, regarding whether or not to accept a manuscript. The editor and editor in chief will ultimately decide whether to accept or reject the submission in the interim.
  6. No later than one month is the author allowed to make revisions to the manuscript. Requests for additional time for revisions should be sent to editorijmaks@gmail.com, via email. The Author is considered to have resigned if no communication is received within the allotted time.
  7. The International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS) will publish manuscripts that have undergone final revisions and been approved by the editor in chief in the edition that is chosen. The chief editor may be asked by the author if they would prefer to publish their essay in particular editions (numbers and volumes). For this reason, the request must be sent by email (editorijmaks@gmail.com) to the editor in chief of the International Journal of Management Knowledge Sharing (IJMaKS).